« Shouldn't Family Be Above Party Politics? | Main | From Vision to Poop Jokes »

September 09, 2008

Why Are the Networks in Charge of Democracy in This Country?

Electricalplug Like many Canadians, I have questions about the networks' decision to bar Elizabeth May from the Federal leadership debate.

Who put the television networks in charge of deciding which political party leaders get to participate in the federal leadership debates -- and who is asked to stay home? And why do the leadership candidates themselves get a say in vetoing a fellow candidate?

Why isn't Elections Canada in charge of this process?

Finally, who thought it would be in Canadians' best interest to outsource this function -- and which parties benefited from the decision to privatize this fundamental aspect of democracy?

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c655353ef00e5551080fd8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why Are the Networks in Charge of Democracy in This Country?:

» Layton and Harper are Yellow from Abandoned Stuff by Saskboy
Prime Minister Stephen Harper said letting May participate in the debates would be in essence allowing a second Liberal candidate to participate, which he called fundamentally unfair. - Source CBC.ca - Actual Conservative m... [Read More]

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.